Author: numan
Legal Costs Explained
Costs Terminology
It can be daunting as a client to receive a document full of legal jargon related to your case. This easy to understand jargon buster will help you understand the common terminology used in the field of legal costs.
Act as a solicitor – To perform those acts that only a solicitor may perform
Additional liability – The success fee, the insurance premium or the additional amount in respect of provision made by a membership organisation, as the case maybe.
Admissible offer – An offer to settle that is not an offer to which costs consequences under Part 36 apply and which is capable of being drawn to the Court’s attention.
ADR – Abbreviation for alternative dispute resolution
Advocacy services – Any services that it would be reasonable to expect a person who is exercising, or contemplating exercising, a right of audience in relation to any proceedings, or contemplated proceedings, to provide.
After the Event Insurance – Legal Expenses insurance (a form of general insurance) incepted after the event giving rise to the claim to which the insurance relates, usually specific to a single claim.
After the Event premium – A premium payable for after the event insurance.
Alternative dispute resolution – Collective description of methods of resolving disputes otherwise than through the normal trial process.
Appropriate authorised body – In relation to any person claiming to be entitled to rights of audience by virtue of 27(2)(a)(i) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, the authorised body (a) granting that right and (b) of which that person is a member
Assisted Person – A person who is in receipt of legal aid or a person within the statutory provisions relating to legal aid.
Authorised advocate – Any person who had a right of audience granted by an authorised body in accordance with the provisions of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990; no superseded by the term ‘authorised person’
Authorised Court officer – Any officer of the county court and its hearing centres, a district registry, the principal registry of the family division, the costs office.
Base Costs – Costs other than the amount of any additional liability
Base Rate – The interest rate set by the Bank of England, which is used as the basis for other bank rates.
Before the event insurance – Legal expenses insurance that is incepted before the event giving rise to any claim.
Budget – An estimate of the reasonable and proportionate costs (including disbursements) that a party intends to incur in the proceedings.
Budget discussion report – a document based upon Precedent R that is prepared for the Court and which contains a records of (a) those figures that are agreed for each phase, (b) those figures that are not agreed for each phase and (c) a brief summary of the grounds of dispute.
Bullock Order – A co-defendant order whereby the claimant is to pay the successful defendant’s costs, but is permitted to add those costs to the costs to be recovered from and unsuccessful defendant.
CCFA – Abbreviation for conditional fee agreement
CFA Lite – A colloquial phrase used to refer to a conditional fee agreement whereby the monies paid to the legal service provider are limited to those costs that are recovered from an opponent.
Collective conditional fee agreement – A template contract for services that may be applied to individual cases to form conditional-fee-agreement-like arrangements, either for the benefit of the counterparties or other persons.
Conditional fee agreement – An agreement enforceable under s 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. An agreement with a person providing advocacy or litigation services that provides for that person’s fees and expenses, or any part of them, to be made payable only in specified circumstances.
Contentious business – Business done, whether as a solicitor or advocate in or for the purpose of proceedings begun before a court. Not business which fall between the definition of non-contentious or common form probate business contained in section 128 of the senior courts act 1981.
Contentious business agreement – A contact of retainer that is compliant with the requirements of s 59 of the Solicitors Act 1974 and which, subject to certain safeguards, will allow the solicitors to recover their fees for contentious work as if those fees were an ordinary debt.
Contingency fee agreement – A contact of retainer under which the legal representatives fee usually in relation to contentious business, is calculated by reference to the amount of money that is reserved for the client.
Contract of retainer – A contract for services pursuant to which a legal services provider agrees to provide legal services for valuable consideration.
Costs – Include, charges, disbursements, expenses, remuneration, reimbursement allowed to a litigant in person under CPR 46.5, and any fee or reward charges by a lay representative for acting on behalf of a party in proceedings allocated to the small claims track. Where appropriate, any additional liability incurred under a funding arrangement may be included, but this would be under the pre-2013 CPR 43.2(1)(a) rather than the present-day equivalent.
Costs capping order – An order limiting the amount of future costs (including disbursements) that a party may recover pursuant to an order for costs subsequently made.
Costs Judge – A ‘taxing master of the Senior Court’ also referring to regional costs judges
Costs management – The ability of the Court to manage the costs to be incurred by the parties to litigation by making costs management orders.
Costs management order – An order that will (a) record the extent to which the budgeted costs are agreed between the parties, (b) in respect of the budgeted costs that are not agreed, record the Court’s approval after making appropriate revisions, and (c) record the extent (if any) to which incurred costs are agreed.
Costs office – The Senior Courts Costs office
Costs officer – collective term for a costs judge, a district judge or an authorised court officer
Damages-based agreement – An agreement that complies with the provisions of the damages-based agreements regulations 2013
DBA – Abbreviation for damages-based agreement.
Deemed Order – An order that is deemed to be made on the happening of a specified event, especially where (a) a party allows Court fees to remain unpaid after having been given notice to pay by the Court, (b) a party accepts a Part 36 offer of (c) a party discontinues a claim.
Default costs certificate – A costs certificate that is issued in default of paying party not serving points of dispute.
Detailed assessment – The procedure by which the amount of costs is decided by a costs officer in accordance with Part 47
Detailed bill – A statue bill that contains detailed items and therefore is not a gross sum bill.
Detailed breakdown – A document, often in a similar familiar to a bill of costs, which contains particulars of the costs that have already been claimed in a gross sum bill.
Director – The person designated as the Director of Legal Aid Casework pursuant to s 4 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 or person entitled to exercise the functions of the director
Disburse – To pay monies (usually disbursements)
Disbursement – Money paid on behalf of the Client. As between solicitor and client, those monies that are not profit costs or taxes, but which can be properly be included within a statue bill. As between opposing parties, recoverable monies paid by the client to persons other than their legal services provider.
Discounted conditional fee agreement – A type of conditional fee agreement whereby reduced (discounted) costs are payable in the event of the case not ultimately being successful.
Final costs certificate – A document that states the amount of costs which have been assessed and, unless the Court orders otherwise, will include an order to pay the costs to which it relates.
Fixed Costs – Costs, the amounts of which are fixed by the CPR, whether or not the Court has discretion to allow some other amount or no amount, and which include: (a) the amounts that are to be allowed in respect of legal representatives’ charges in the circumstances set out in Section 1 of Part 45; (b) fixed recoverable costs calculated in accordance with CPR, r45.11; (c) the additional costs allowed by r 45.18; (d) fixed costs determined under CPR, r45.21; and € costs fixed by CPR r 45.37 and 45.38.
Fixed price agreement – A contract of retainer that provides for remuneration of a legal services provider on a predetermined, fixed basis.
Forthwith order – An order made prior to the conclusion of proceedings for the purposes of allowing a party’s costs to be assessed notwithstanding the general rule (in CPR 47.1) that the costs of any proceedings are not to be assessed by the detailed procedure until the conclusion of the proceedings.
FPA – Abbreviation for a fixed price agreement
Fund – Includes any estate or property held for the benefit of any person or class of person and any fund to which a trustee or personal representative is entitled in their capacity. Colloquial term used to refer to the Legal Aid Fund or the CLS fund.
Funder – A third party who has funded litigation. A person agrees to fund the provision of advocacy or litigation services to another person. The party to a collective conditional agreement who, under that agreement, is liable to pay for the legal representative’s fees.
Funding arrangement – An arrangement whereby a person has (a) entered into a conditional fee or collective fee agreement that provides for a success fee within the meaning of s58(2) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, (b) taken out an insurance policy to which s 29 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 applies or (c) made an agreement with a membership organisation to meet the person’s legal costs.
Future costs – Costs incurred in respect of work done after the date of a cross capping order, but excluding the amount of any additional liability. Informal term for any costs yet to be incurred.
General retainer – A contract of retainer pursuant to which a legal services provider provides services generally rather than in respect of a specific claim or matter.
Gross sum bill – A statute bill that lacks detailed items; used only in relation to contentious business.
Indemnity – A right to recover from a third party the whole amount that the recoverer is liable to pay.
Indemnity basis – A basis of assessment whereby the Court will resolve any doubt as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount in favour to the receiving party; under the CPR, the costs would not be subjected to a test of proportionality.
Insurance – The payment of one or more, commonly called ‘premiums’, by one party, in return for which the other party under-takes to pay a sum of money on the happening of a specified event, which event must be one that is adverse to the interests of the policyholder. After the event insurance.
Insurance premium – The consideration required of the assured in return for which the insurer undertakes its obligation under the contract of insurance. A sum of money paid or payable for insurance against the risk of incurring a costs liability in the proceedings, taken out after the event that is the subject matter of the claim.
Interim costs certificate – A certificate containing an order for an interim payment of costs made after the receiving party has filed a request for a detailed assessment hearing.
Interim statue bill – A statue bill (that is, not a request for a payment on account) that is rendered by a solicitor to a client prior to the determination of the relevant retainer.
Joint liability – A single liability jointly between parties; each party can be held liable for the whole of it.
Legal activities – An activity that is a reserved legal activity within the meaning of the Legal Service Act 2007
Legal aid – Civil legal services made available under arrangements made for purposes of Part 1 of the Legal aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.
Legal representative – A barrister, solicitor, solicitors’ employee, manager of a body authorised under s 9 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985. A person exercising a right of audience or conducting litigation on a party’s behalf.
Litigation funding agreement – An agreement between a party in litigation and a third party whereby the latter, in return for valuable consideration, provides commercial funding for the purposes of funding the former’s involvement in the litigation.
Litigation services – Any services that it would be reasonable to expect a person who is exercising, or contemplating exercising, a right to conduct litigation in relation to any proceedings, or contemplated proceedings to provide.
LSC-funded client – An individual who receives service funded by the Legal Service Commission as part of the Community Legal Service within the meaning of Part 1 of the Access to Justice Act 1999.
Membership organisation – A body prescribed for the purposes of s 30 of the Access to Justice Act 1999
Non-contentious business – Any business done as a solicitor that is not contentious business
Non-contentious business agreement – A contract of retainer that is compliant with the requirements of s 57 of the Solicitors Act 1974 and which, subject to certain safeguards allow the solicitor to recover their fees as if were an ordinary debt.
Non-party costs order – An order against a person who is not a party to the litigation, but who is in some way connected to it.
Notional premium – An additional amount payable to a membership organisation pursuant to s 30 of the Access to Justice Act 1999.
Paying Party – A party liable to pay costs.
Payment on account – A payment made pursuant to an order made under CPR r 44.2(8). A payment made on account of costs that is not made in satisfaction of a statue bill.
Percentage Increase – The percentage by which the amount of a legal representative’s fee can be increased in accordance with a conditional fee agreement that provides for a success fee.
Porrect to – To put forward or submit a bill for examination or correction.
Postponement charge – That a percentage increase, if any, which relates to the costs That part of the percentage increase, if any, which relates to the cost of the legal representative of the postponement of the payment of their fees and expenses; also know as postponement element or a charge for postponement.
Practice form – form to be used for a particular purpose in proceedings, the form and purpose being specified by a practice direction.
Pre-action protocol – Statements of best practice about pre-action conduct that have been approved by the Head of Civil Justice and are listed in Practice Direction.
Privilege – The right of a party to refuse to disclose a document or to produce a document or refuse to answer questions on the ground of some special interest recognised by law
Pro bono representation – Legal representation provided free of charge
Profit costs – The fees (that are not disbursements) charged by a solicitor for the legal services they have provided.
QOCS – Abbreviation for qualified one-way costs shifting.
Qualified one way costs shifting – A procedural fetter on the recovery of costs in certain personal injury and fatal accident cases such that (unless the claimant has been fundamentally dishonest), only the claimant may recover the costs of the claim.
Receiving party – a party entitled to be paid costs.
Regional costs judge – A specialist judge who has been appointed to hear certain high-value or complex detailed assessments.
Regulated person – Any class of persons which consist of or includes (a) persons who are authorised by the body to carry on an activity which is reserved legal activity; (b) persons who are not so authorised but are employees of a person who is so authorised.
Request for payment on account – An invoice (other than a statute bill) rendered by a solicitor to a client requesting payment on account of costs.
Reserved instrument activities – Collective phrase for the act of (a) preparing any instrument of transfer or charge for the purposes of the Land Registration Act 2002 (d) making an application or lodging a document for registration under that act (c) preparing any other instrument relating to real or personal estate for the purposes of the law of England and Wales.
Reserved legal activity – Activity including (a) the exercise of a right of audience (b) the conduct of litigation (c) reserved instrument activities (d) probate activities € notarial activities and (f) administration of oaths.
Right of audience – The right to exercise any of the functions of appearing before and addressing a court, including the calling and examining of witnesses.
Right to conduct litigation – (a) the issuing of proceedings before any court in England and Wales (b) the commencement, prosecution and defence of such proceedings (c) the performance of ancillary functions in relation to such proceedings.
Rules of Court – The civil procedure rules 1998. Rules made by the authority having power to make rules or orders regulating the practice and procedure of the Court. Rulings of the Court in individual cases.
Sanderson order – A co-defendant order whereby an unsuccessful defendant is ordered directly to pay the successful defendant costs.
Service – Steps required by rules of the court to bring documents used in court proceedings to a persons attention.
Several liability – liability whereby a person may remain liable for the whole claim even where judgement has been obtained against the others with whom they share liability.
Standard basis – A basis of assessment whereby the court will resolve any doubt as to whether the costs were reasonably incurred or where reasonable in a mount in favour fo the paying party; under the CPR, the costs would be subjected to a test of proportionality.
Statute bill – An invoice rendered by a solicitor to a client that is bona fide compliant with the requirements of s 69 of the solicitors Act 1974
Success fee – A type of additional liability that is the product of a percentage increase and the base costs to which, pursuant to a conditional fee agreement, it applies.
Third-party costs order – A non-party costs order.
Unqualified person – A person who has not been admitted as a solicitor and who does not hold a current practising certificate.
Wasted costs – Costs other than the costs ordered pursuant to the Court’s inherent jurisdiction, which are ordered against a legal representative as a result of that persons negligent, unreasonable or improper behaviour.
Wasted costs order – An order (a) that the legal representative pay a specified sun in respect of costs to a party or (b) for costs relating to a specified sum or items of work to be disallowed.
Without prejudice – 1. Without loss of any rights 2. Restriction on circumstances in which the content of negotiations conducted with a view to settlement may be revealed to the Court,
Craig
Hi Nicolas, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for swift help in getting the documentation processed last week. I was on a tight time scale and I was impressed that you called me out of normal business hours. You provided an excellent service for someone you’ve not worked with before.
R Nabi
We have just completed on a buy and sell having used Versus Law for both sides of the transaction.
Versus Law have been immense throughout, with the Conveyancer looking after our ‘purchase’ working hand in hand with his colleagues to keep us informed of how the ‘sell’ was progressing too.
Amazing bunch of people. There should be more firms providing this high level of service.
B Keane
Very professional and up to the task
I found versus law straight forward and very helpful.
K Boon
i recently completed on a property and was guided really well by Katrina and Lisa. Ive never purchased a property before so really didn’t know what was involved. It was easy and seamless no stress at all followed by a price that was so much cheaper than other quotes I’d had
M Rehman
Having had my PIA flight delayed for over 5 hours.. Anita Craig of versus law solicitors was a great help. Every step was made easy for me to understand and I will definitely be recommending yourselves to family and friends.
J Nugent
They made the whole process of my injury claim
simple and straight forward, They even managed to get
me my compensation before Christmas which I wasn’t expecting, A big thanks to Kulbinder Mehay
Steven P
Excellent work, thank you.
How to stop a fraudster from making themselves at home – the fake ‘sister’ who tried to sell Marie’s house.
Did you hear about the recent story of the Reverend who came home to find his entire house had been stolen?
You may not think this can happen to you, but the Land Registry confirms that around £3.5m was paid out to victims of similar crimes.
Here at Versus Law Solicitors we had a similar matter, but thanks to our eagle-eyed conveyancers in Manchester, the fraudsters were out of luck in this attempt to steal someone’s home! Throughout the fraud, the real homeowner, who we will call Marie, was totally unaware that a fraudster was trying to sell her house behind her back.
The story was covered by BBC News and was featured on Radio 4’s ‘You and Yours’ programme. Investigative Journalist Shari Vahl should be commended for her work in highlighting this transaction, and in particular the Office of Public Guardianship’s lack of checking procedures when a Lasting Power of Attorney is issued. The article and the radio programme can be found here:
BBC Radio 4’s ‘You and Yours’ Programme
In this blog, we will tell you what tactics the fraudsters used, how the scam was spotted, then prevented; and give you tips on how you can protect yourself and your property from similar scams. Our homes are our most valued possessions and should be protected.
Setting the scene
- Versus Law Solicitors were instructed by a person claiming to be called Julie in March 2021 to sell the property.
- The fraudster pretended to be Homeowner’s sister and presented us with a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) allegedly given to her by her ‘sister’, Marie, giving her full authority to sell the house in her ‘sister’s’ name.
- The fraudster then provided her own ID and the LPA to us and signed relevant documentation.
This is a normal start to selling a property, however, it was noted when setting up the file that a vulnerable person could be involved as an LPA had been presented by the fraudster. As such, the matter was escalated to a senior staff member for consideration. Whenever we spoke to the fraudster, we were concerned by her demeanor and what she was saying. She told us that her sister was not well and that is why the LPA was entered into. We asked for her ‘sister’s’ ID and confirmation that she lacked capacity. This evidence was never provided.
When the buyer’s (fraudster) solicitor came on record it was also noted that a company was buying the property, not an individual, whilst this can be a normal occurrence, when combined with the LPA it made this an unusual conveyancing sale.
Our Investigations and concerns
In the middle of April 2021, the Fraudster was again asked for the Homeowner’s ID and their consent, as these had not been provided yet.
The fraudster rang and queried these requests, saying she had not been asked to provide these before. This suggests that she may have tried a similar scan previously. She was informed that ID was mandatory; and that Marie still needs to give verbal or written consent to the sale as we did not know that she lacked capacity.
This was flagged up by 2 senior conveyancers in our property department. A request for ID and confirmation of capacity should have been easy to comply with if the LPA was valid and was clearly being avoided by the fraudster.
The fraudster waited a couple of days and then called in again saying that her ‘sister’ was not sound of mind and could not give consent. She was using every excuse she could to avoid providing the requested documents, hoping we would let it slide and proceed with the transaction.
At this point due to our previous concerns, the way the Fraudster had been evasive and after discussion with the Managing Partner of the Firm, Waqas Chaudhri, further investigations were carried out and all work on the file was put on immediate hold.
- The LPA appeared to have been drafted/signed/witnessed by the same person all the way through – the witnesses and Marie’s signature appeared to have been done by the same hand.
- The veracity of the LPA could not be checked online.
- Searches found that the names listed in the LPA did not match up to any of the neighbours who were listed as witnesses.
- The buying company’s main address seemed to be just a correspondence address and not offices.
These factors, together with our growing list of concerns, the decision was made to only work on this matter once contact with the homeowner had been made. For the matter to be placed on the risk register of the company so that it can managed and monitored to the upmost of detail by a senior member of the firm.
Enquiries were made to ascertain the real owners’ details so that contact could be made and Marie was advised that the fraudsters were trying to sell her home. We requested that the management company send the management pack directly to the homeowner. As her managing agents, they would have her direct contact details and email, etc, meaning she would be notified.
Shortly after Versus Law did this, the Fraudster rang to say they were no longer instructing us and requested the management pack be sent directly to the address (this is because they had already gained illegal access to the property, something we found out later).
Red Flags spotted by Versus Law
During the attempted transaction by the fraudster, we spotted the following potential red flags.
- Selling an unencumbered property (no mortgage)
- Legal Power of Attorney being used, fraudster applied for LPA themselves
- The LPA was suspect, similar handwriting, could not be checked and the witnesses looked fictitious
- Transactional distance
- Property being bought by a Company
- The property was owned but not lived in currently by the owner
- Buyers’ estate agent was 100 miles from buyer and property
- The fraudster did not provide ID, consent, or any correspondence from the homeowner
- Could not provide medical evidence that the homeowner was no longer of sound mind
- The buyer offered to pay the seller’s legal fees
- Wanted proceeds to go into a bank account other than the homeowner’s
Whilst there may be a valid reason for these in most transactions, we were not convinced by the fraudster’s explanations and the lack of evidence in support.
What happened next?
The homeowner contacted Versus Law once they had received the homeowners pack, they were in quite a shock as it was the first they had heard of anything. Imagine finding out that a fraudster had tried to sell your house behind your back!
Marie told us that she went to check on the property to find that the locks on the house had been drilled out and changed by the fraudster! This allowed them to access the property as if they were the homeowner on any visits, and for the interception of any mail being sent to the property (which is why the fraudster asked us to send the management pack directly to the property).
Versus Law told Marie exactly what had happened so far and continues to assist her in bringing the fraudster to justice.
Reporter, Shari Vahl, came in to speak with us and has taken up an investigation into this matter and discussed it and a similar fraud that happened on her weekly show, You& Yours, on BBC Radio 4. The investigation was also covered by BBC News.
A message from Marie:
“Just a quick email to say a big “Thank You” for taking part in the Radio 4 You&Yours programme. It’s great to read that you’ll be publishing a blog on this, too, as my main reason for contacting the BBC was to raise awareness among the legal and financial communities of the need to be cautious about taking the LPA document at face value – and hopefully prompt discussion about what needs to change. While trying to find help, I contacted lots of law firms: not one of them had a clue that this document could be forged, and each of them initially expressed disbelief. ”
How you can protect yourself?
This scam mainly involves properties that do not have an outstanding mortgage against them. This removes an extra financial layer to the scam and could easily mean the correct owner is contacted.
The quickest and most important thing that every homeowner should do is sign up to a free Land registry service called Property Alerts. You will receive an email that would alert you at the first instance any action is taken in relation to your property. In our view, whilst this is a good first step, you may be alerted when it is too late to act ie. After the property has been sold. The emails may also go into your junk folder, which may not be checked until it is too late.
A better option is to place an anti-fraud restriction on your home so that if a transfer is attempted, you will be contacted and can ensure it is legitimate before it happens. This service costs £40 but will secure your position much more. It is still not 100% effective though. For example, if a fraudster got hold of your ID, or replicated your ID, then they could pretend to be you and apply to remove the restriction when selling your home.
The best option, in our opinion, would be for a solicitor or conveyancer to be required to remove the restriction. This can be your own solicitor, so you can be assured that your property is sold only if you want it to be.
You can find out more from HM Land Registry’s website using the following link:
Protect your land and property from fraud – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
We are always here to help, and if you have any questions regarding placing a restriction on your home or any other property related matter, please contact us.
Versus Law Solicitors
10 Lapwing Lane
Didsbury
Manchester
M20 2WS
info@versuslaw.co.uk
0161 249 5087
What are Conveyancing Fees?
What are conveyancing Fees?
They are a group of legal costs you will pay when buying or selling a house. They cover the cost of exchanging contracts, and carrying out all the steps needed to complete your purchase or sale.
They are the basic fee that you pay the conveyancer for their actual work. This figure can vary based on all sorts of different factors, from the location of the firm to how complicated the transaction is.
Fees can include:
- ID Checks
- Searches
- Land Registry Checks
- Leasehold Fees
- Gifted Deposit Checks
There are additional fees you may have to pay to the government such as stamp duty but these are not included in the conveyancing fees you have to pay to your conveyancing solicitor.
How much are conveyancing fees?
Conveyancing fees do vary but are typically between £550-£1500, plus the cost of disbursements. Legal fees for leasehold properties are slightly more. Legal costs depend on the circumstances of the transaction such as the cost of the property, whether its freehold or leasehold amongst others.
You can use our free conveyancing calculator.
https://www.versuslaw.co.uk/services/conveyancing/conveyancing-calculator/
Which will give you an accurate figure for you to work with and detail all the mandatory fees.
Are conveyancing fees negotiable?
Most conveyancers work on tight margins to but Versus Law will always try to price match if you have found a better offer elsewhere. Fees such as searches will be refunded if they are not fully spent. Depending on the location and property type some mortgage companies require additional searches to be performed.
Are conveyancing fees paid upfront?
Unlike other solicitors where you might have to pay an upfront deposit when you hire your conveyancer or solicitor, we only ask that you pay for your searches in advance.
You’ll then pay us the final amount once the sale of the house is completed.
If the sale falls through or the seller backs out, you might have to pay some or all of the conveyancing fees for legal work already completed.
Are conveyancing fees tax deductible?
Legal fees of this nature are added to the cost of acquisition and cost of sale when calculating taxable gains on the eventual disposal of a property.
Most conveyancing fees are not deductible from rental profits. Legal fees for the acquisition of a short lease are not tax deductible, whereas fees regarding the renewal of a short lease can be deducted from taxable profits.
Legal costs related to letting agreements can only be deducted from taxable profits where the tenancy is for one year or less. Legal fees relating to evicting a tenant are tax deductible.
How to reduce conveyancing fees
Your conveyancing solicitor does not have to be based in the same town that your property is. Conveyancing fees in London are upto twice as expensive as they are in Manchester yet a conveyancing solicitor in Manchester is able to perform conveyancing for properties nationwide.
Final Note
By understanding what’s involved with conveyancing fees, you can start preparing your budget and enjoy a smoother journey to your big moving day. Best of luck with your final steps! Need a conveyancing quote? Click here for a quote